Barack Obama has won. We know this. I feel like now is an appropriate time to discuss the political landscape, which goals President-elect Obama will be able to achieve while in office, and the markets reaction to the election.
I’d like to start with the market, if only because my prediction regarding the Dow, NASDAQ, and S&P were off. From what I understand, the stock market has a higher average annual return in the first year of a Democratic President than in the first year of a Republican administration. This is simply a historical fact. I (wrongfully) believed that market sentiment in post-election day trading would reflect a kind of cautious optimism, with a major late day sell off to capture gains. I should have realized that in a recession and global financial crisis, the markets would not be as inclined to agree. However, hindsight is always 20/20 and I just didn’t see it coming. The Dow is down another 4.75% and the NAS and S&P are tracking close. I’ve gone on the record with a few associates with my belief that we haven’t reached the bottom. I believe there will be small gains, but the trend will continue downward up until, or potential after, a new stimulus package is passed by Congress. I’m not advocating for such a package for any partisan reason, nor am I even sure that I’m advocating another stimulus, but it will come. Hopefully, it will help.
From what I’ve heard, the S&P could realign with a bottom of 750-800. It will be difficult for the Dow to track below 7700, so we’ll call that the bottom. Perhaps it’s my bias toward the tech sector, but I believe the NASDAQ won’t fall much below it’s October 27th bottom of 1505, so we’ll put the floor in at 1450. The only other ticker I follow with any consistency is the NAS Powershares (QQQQ). I still believe that any opportunity to buy at or around 28 will be a steal as a medium to long term investment.
Moving on… Congratulations Rahm Emanuel. From the CNN reports I’ve read, “Rahm-bo” will be an excellent Chief of Staff. I understand that there will be (and already has been) some rumbling about Emanuel’s brazen, partisan approach, and I understand why. You are correct when you state that Barack Obama is a liberal democrat. You are correct when you state the Rahm Emanuel is a liberal democrat. But you are wrong when you state that they will govern in that manner. Barack Obama will fill out a bipartisan and well-rounded cabinet. As per his campaign, he will listen to all sides of an argument or issue before making a decision. Once that decision is made, people will have to get over their feelings and move onto the next topic. There is a lot to be done, and there are plenty of blow-hards on both sides of the aisle in Washington. Rahm isn’t one of them. That reason alone will make him a great Chief of Staff.

Congratulations, now please do your job, and do it well.
He is not the decision maker, but he will be a bulldozer that clears useless information out of the way for President Obama. Utilizing the cliche “good cop/bad cop” approach, Democrats and Republicans will have to come to the middle and work together. As honestly and directly as I can state it: Barack Obama will govern from the center. He will govern as a moderate. What makes me say that? Well, lets examine a few of his proposals and the current state of the government.
A quick glance at the issues listed by Barack Obama on his campaign webpage begin to give insight into his priorities.
1) The Economy
- A new stimulus bill will be passed, either by the current Congress or soon after January 20th. It will probably come in the form of tax rebates, somewhere in the range of $200. As much as Oil companies hate the concept of a windfall tax, I can’t be opposed to it when the country is in a certifiable recession and Exxon Mobil posted the largest US quarterly profit ever. If this tax relief is enacted, even for one year, the average American will realize an adjusted income rise of about 4%. I could be wrong here, but that’s coming a lot closer to tracking inflation than any other adjusted wage gains of the past 20 years.
- This stimulus will also include some new and much needed protection from foreclosure. However, I believe it must on an individual or families primary and only home, and to receive relief, the family must be able to afford traditional 30 yr/fixed mortgage payments on the property.
- Part of an Obama relief plan will go into infrastructure improvement, which will have an immediate impact on the unemployment rate. This matters to me for a multitude of reasons, but the primary two being that I work for two infrastructure companies and that I live in a county with the 9th highest unemployment rate in the country.
- Overall, my taxes, and the taxes of the majority of the U.S. population, who are just like me, will GO DOWN.
- We won’t touch free trade, nor should we. I understand there is a lot of talk of fair trade, which is an incredibly nice way of seeing how the world economy could be, but it’s just not a reality at this point. Obama is not a protectionist and will (or at least should) give up on these “goals” quickly. I believe this is a good thing.
- We won’t realize 5 million new jobs via the green movement, but progress will be made.
2) Education
- The last time I tracked Federal spending on education was around 2006. It was about 3% of the total budget. I believe it’s safe to assume it is no more than 4.5% in the 2008 budget. No Child Left Behind is both flawed and severely underfunded. However, it’s core principles are sound, and the policy should be revised. These were my thoughts from day one, and they mirror the policies proposed by Obama.
- Obama has charged every American with making sacrifices and giving back. He also wants to help. I believe the best example of the conjoining of these policies is the fully refundable tax credit given for the first $4,000 of college tuition, if the student performs 100 hours of community service. Under Jeb Bush, a well-liked (especially by me) Republican Governor of the State of Florida, the bright futures scholarship was established for students who performed a certain amount of community service. It makes sense, and it works. I also believe that education SHOULD be the easiest issue for both parties of government to agree upon.
3) Energy Policy
- Here Obama has some incredibly lofty goals, which I can guarantee not all of which will be met. However, there are some sound and realistic policies that Obama will implement to improve our environment and our energy situation.
- First and foremost, renewable energy investment makes sense. Ask GOOGLE, who invested millions of dollars into a solar thermal company. The government will subsidize these renewable energy companies. This will spark more innovation.
- Clean Coal is either a buzz word or a potentially useful technology. I don’t know. I do know that Nuclear Energy makes sense, and I actually like having someone in office who agrees in principle, but whose going to pour over the details before the government approves a large scale expansion of Nuclear Power plants. I don’t believe “safe” and “secure” should be words used to roadlblock building these plants, but attainable conditions and requirements should be created. If you see Senator Dick Lugar (R-IN) involved, then we’ll know that Obama is serious.
I believe that last “big project” that will be achieved under the first four years of this administration is mandatory and universal healthcare for children. It will pass, and I don’t believe it will be as partisan of a battle as some people expect. Hillary Clinton wanted universal health care and made it a cornerstone of her campaign. A lot of conservatives didn’t like that concept (author bias: I support universal health care). Obama stuck to his initial agenda of children’s health care all the way through the election. It will be step one. SCHIP, a current government children’s health care program has been popular, and it’s expansion in 2007 was vetoed by President Bush. Add it all up, and the U.S. should start protecting its children’s health within the first two years of the Obama administration. Again, I believe this a moderate approach to a partisan issue, and Obama comes out in the center. If I knew anything else about the administration or it’s success, I have a feeling that I’d be working at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

I love my job, but feel free to e-mail me about opportunities. My resume includes 12 blog posts!
I don’t have much more in the way of knowledge regarding the Obama administration, but I believe we’re in for an interesting two years. The economy will recover, we will reduce our troop level in Iraq to 30,000-40,000 by then end of 2010. I hope to see improvements in Afghanistan. I’m strong believer in both Gates and Petraeus, and believe they should remain in their posts. I’m not sure of other cabinet posts, but I’ll continue to watch closely as Obama identifies his economic team.
I want to close with a few quotes made by Republicans officials after the election. I believe this kind of honesty and integrity is what the Republican Party will have to bank on in the upcoming years.
“We have got to clean up, reform and rebuild the Republican Party before we can ask Americans to trust us again. This must begin with either a change of command at the highest levels or our current leaders must embrace a bold new direction,” Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., said in a statement moments after Obama clinched the election. “Our party must start today to admit our mistakes, fight for our convictions and encourage new conservatives to run for office.”
DeMint - Thank You.
“The party just simply lost its way,” said Republican Dick Armey, the former House majority leader from Texas. “It was no longer about small government and individual liberties … and the party became enormously unattractive to the American people.”

Armey - Frank and Honest Assessment
I’ve said it a few times, and I believe it bears repeating. The Republican Party and it’s agenda is not inherently bad. Or at least it wasn’t. The tenants of small government, personal responsibility, free markets, state’s rights and responsibilities, and a strong national defense are all fair and well supported policies. I don’t necessarily believe with republicans on a host of social issues, but I think that’s ok. I think, given the structure of our government, a healthy two party debate is necessary for proper policy. But when the GOP isn’t sure what it stands for, it leads to people arguing not about the issues, but rather about the character of the candidate and his/her constituency. You can regain the trust of the American people by identifying conservative policies that people want in their lives and government, and sticking to those policies. I can’t tell you what the right ones are, but I can tell you there is plenty of room in the U.S. government for a difference of opinion.
Like I said before, I’m glad that Barack Obama doesn’t have a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, but I’m also hopeful that there are Republicans in office who will be willing to work toward the middle.
Latest Comments...